Mohtashim wrote a piece "Code is Cheap" which highlights a common theme among 80% of startup advice you’re likely to get: stop trying to tweak your technology, figure out how to sell. More specifically (from the post):

Sell, sell sell, share, sell, market market market. Your brand, your domain, your service.

I agree with Mohstashim in that he’s talking about after your product’s in beta and before it reaches version 3. That’s fair, but if you spend enough time asking for people’s advice, you’re likely to hear the same thing about very early stages as well… put out a broken product and find someone you can sell it to, …

" />

Startups: Is Tech really irrelevant? Is Sales all that matters?

Share this Article


Mohtashim wrote a piece "Code is Cheap" which highlights a common theme among 80% of startup advice you’re likely to get: stop trying to tweak your technology, figure out how to sell. More specifically (from the post):

Sell, sell sell, share, sell, market market market. Your brand, your domain, your service.

I agree with Mohstashim in that he’s talking about after your product’s in beta and before it reaches version 3. That’s fair, but if you spend enough time asking for people’s advice, you’re likely to hear the same thing about very early stages as well… put out a broken product and find someone you can sell it to, they’ll say. Let the customer pay for the development costs, they’ll boast. You’re likely to hear this advice from everyone from Guy Kawasaki type entrepreneurship mentors to local advisors.

Unfortunately, I dont agree that this choice is a binary one of choosing between tech or selling, and I wish mentors or advisors spent more time considering the gray areas in between. Here’s my take on this issue, in an attempt to guide any other startup who’s been confused out of its innocent little wits by people pushing down this message too hard.

And with a deep sip of coffee, here we go.

Here’s a few important things to keep in mind or ask yourself when you’re trying to answer this question:

1- Is your goal to create money in the short-term, or to create value?

Here’s a hint from my experience — you cant beat brand equity by short-term gains. Building a reputation as a company, as a person or as a product, and building a brand around it that people want to believe, can open up several different types of revenue streams down the road which just arent possible by focusing on near-terms sales.

I’d argue that near-term sales will infact drastically slow down your ability to gain early traction, market-share, reputation, or brand equity – but then this argument will probably fall of deaf ears in the pak IT startup culture.

But if you do have a worthwhile product, think about your goals for a bit – do you want to take an exit from the company in 3-4 years by having the product acquired or something? If you seriously think your product solves a global issue that has demand today, then wouldnt it make more sense to try and get a head-start on anyone who might follow you once you’re out in the public… gain as much market share as possible, which can later be retained via attention, relaunches, service, value-addition or other things?

In the early stages, there’s a huge difference between free and charging even a $1. Even a $1 will drastically reduce your product’s ability to spread virally.

Even if you were broke and thought of selling your way through – the "let the customer pay for your development" argument only works if your product’s price point can cover your next release cycle… i.e. if you’re charging between $50,000 – $300,000 for a single license.

Some products just arent built for that, and its fine – even from a business point-of-view, some products are built to capture the "consumer surplus" of the market, or the long-tail of the market, both of which can eventually nett you more money than that single license, but over the lifecycle of usage of the product by a single customer paying in smaller transactions. Thats fine! Figure out what you can sell for – here’s some tipshere’s some more.

2- Can tech creates barriers to entry?

Well the obvious way is to create patentable technology and ride the wave. If you’re one of those startups, why’re you reading this anyway?

There are lots of ways "business stuff" can create barriers to entry… but none of them are as solid as a barrier to entry technique employed by web2.0 web app designs – the network effect.

Most "social" software, collaborative software, or otherwise software design for user input gets more and more useful for each user as more users enter the system.

Mind you this isnt a clever business hack – this is pure techy genius. Picture Youtube without videos or slideshare without powerpoints… utterly useless. Or picture Twitter without its key users.

Picture Facebook but without your friends.

These sites are incredibly easy to clone, sure (I mean who couldn’t make a twitter clone when practicing php) – but you cannot, and will not, beat twitter at its game because thats where everyone already is! The network effect is one of the reasons you cant call yourself a serious startup company if you’re trying  to create another social network, or twitter clone or something.

Sure we can find examples of some of those networks working within "localized contexts" but … please I’m talking about something that can gain enough market share for you to get acquired.

You can choose the "techy" approach of designing your apps so that there are benefits from the network effect…. make sure the more data users put in, the harder it is for them to go away from it. Then give it for free for a while until everyone’s addicted. Then pick from any number of ways of monetizing their addiction. Forget the business types and their sales preaching.

3- Tech gives you the opportunity to market yourself

This line I take from Seth Godin… tech itself wont help you sell, sure, but tech will give you the opportunity to market and sell stuff.

Before you can believe that, you’d have to choose whether you want to take the Microsoft approach and ask "What are the features that someone wants to pay for today? Ok lets build that and charge what they’re willing to pay"  OR   take the apple approach and ask "What are the features that will delight our users? Ok lets build that and charge premium".

Which one you choose depends on a mix of how broke you are and how much you understand building premium value. If you’re judging the value you create by how much lands in your pocket in a month then this conversation wont go very far I’m afraid.

But if you want to believe in premium-pricing via delighted customers, then you should be able to understand that – clearly – the products with better (better == MORE RELEVANT ; MORE USABLE) tech would have a much easier chance of marketing themselves and selling for a premium above their competition. I used CAPS there because the typical comeback to this argument I hear is "No, more features doesnt mean easier to sell" I didnt say more features… I said a focus on building better / more relevant / more usable technology. Even Basecamp succeeds because of better tech (usability).

There’s naturally a balance to this… and what you have to figure out is when is the tech enough to get the premium you were targeting, and when is it time finally unveil and sell or market the product, but make no mistake you should want to put in the time in your tech required to create something valuable to begin with.

4- Tech can enable better customer service from your firm

Trust me, the last thing you want to do is start selling too early, and have you first client ask for a small new feature that you realize will take you 8 months to deliver, just because your architecture is so messed up.

Ultimately, unless you’re building really obscure enterprise products, you should realize you and your users live in an era of abundance. They have about a dozen other options for pretty much any software you can offer them. Considering that most software helps users do something they want to do, they always have the option of NOT using your software and keep living (without it) doing what they wanted in whatever hard, oldfashioned way they were using.

Much more than code, the easiest possible thing to lose is customer attention (I didnt want to say customer attention is cheap… its incredibly hard to gain, but incredibly easy to lose).

You need to expect that your first 20 or so customers will look at a beta and request 20 features each, which the next 10,000 users are going to need…. this is especially true if you’ve been picking your first 20 alpha / beta testers properly and they represent the exact profile of people you’re seeking.

Trust me, you want to be able to make tweaks and new feature additions timely, or people leave. If those 20 leave, 10,000 never join. Trust me, you need decent architecture if you’re gearing up in a fast-paced space like web-apps.

5- Tech can enable better competitive advantage.

Remember this post? In this I compared a product startup to someone selling carrots. And I said:

If the product is the whole suite of vegetables required for making a meal, then how much would it cost the customer to get the product?

If you dont have carrots, the customer will drive to you, buy 4 things, drive elsewhere, buy 1 thing – the total cost includes driving, fighting traffic, walking from parking lot to the storefront, checking out, dealing with people, bearing the heat, spending petrol, and more.

In other words, the customer would just rather save this economic cost and work with the person who has the whole suite of vegetables to begin with, carrots included.

Consider this now from another angle – if you’ve got half an analytical eye and you’re studying the web apps space, you know that the structure of the products people want cannot now be served by a single piece of software or a single web service… people want highly cohesive integration between many services… that WHOLE is the product they’re seeking.

And what if your product cant integrate with anyone else or doesnt have an API or cannot become a micro-service for a bigger product offering? Whoops, bang, gone.

But if your product has tech that can easily integrate 5-6 other micro-services to make niche products on the fly, you’ll basically be faster than your competitors at offering the whole solution.

Obviously, this depends on the space you’re in… but the lifecycle of industries is that as any industry matures, it seeks out horizontal integration to offer higher value-adds to customers (thats when the individual pieces are getting too commoditized to be viable revenue sources in the market). So sooner or later your product will have to have tech that plays nice with others.

I’m sorry to think this but I dont think any local mentor would have a clear understanding of this – the local industry is far too small right now to require horizontal integration…. but take a quick look at the consumer electronics or semi-conductor industries and you’ll see what I mean. If you wanted to build software in those spaces today, it’d better have the tech to integrate with others, or it could go home..

And again, ofcourse, there’s a dozen ways in which "business stuff" will gain you a competitive advantage, but I dont like discounting "tech" as an abomination unto startup-kind that easily.



Ok there are more points I could dig up but lets leave it at that.

After you’re public and launch beta your startup lifecycle, thinking, strategizing will change a lot and you’ll have to focus on money or traction or business issues, but dont get pressurized into coming out too quickly with a broken product thinking you’ll make do selling it one by one.

What you do will vary a lot depending on how much resources you have, how much time you have, how much energy you have and more. If you’ve got 5-6 support staff on duty, you might be ok about releasing a bug-ridden infestation on the world. If its just gonna be you, you need to measure how many bugs you want to handle a week… it doesnt make sense to get overwhelmed and lose customers because you cant service them properly.

Bottom line is, think hard about your space, your product and — very important — think hard about how techy decisions today will help make business stuff tomorrow easier, i.e. how execution can be easier with the right framework in place.

Facebook comments:


  • you really did put a lot of effort into this post didn’t you :)

    i like what you’re saying, even though i might not agree with all of it right now.

    but as you say, i work for a startup that isn’t a startup anymore, so maybe my rules are a bit different.

  • Osama Sb,
    I’ll take the opp to quote your words.. “better == MORE RELEVANT ; MORE USABLE” –

    This is spot on. In the end, you want to either reduce work, pain and expenses for your customer, or help them to create more value for their customers.

    Golden advice… more of what makes me read every post on GNW. It’s as applicable here in Canada as it is in Pakistan.

    – Shahzad

  • Without going into too much detail, let me say that Mohtashim is wrong (or only partially right) at several places in his last post. For example, he says that anyone can read your source code if you have a web application.

    It’s good that people have neutralized his thoughts. Nobody is absolutely right. Ever.

  • Jaywalker – isnt he right in saying anyone can see your sourcecode on the web? How would you protect it?

  • They can see the source code of your HTML, and perhaps your JavaScript/CSS.

    However, they will not have access to your server-side logic and your SQL structure. These are the more important aspects; the actual ‘process’ by which you create value.

    You may also have other mechanisms to provide strategic advantages such as highly optimized database and web clusters, intelligent session management, machine learning profiles, etc.

    It’s not all about a pretty face (HTML), something beauty lies a step deeper :-)

  • I didn’t read such a technical based material before, as it is not my field. But it is really helpful and understandable.

Leave a Reply


Recent Posts

  • Events General Mobile Apps Container Run a continuation of politically motivated apps

    Container Run a continuation of politically motivated apps

    First we had Angry Imran which brought smiles and some short lived fun for us during the election campaign. Then came Gullu Butt following the incident of Model Town Lahore, which stayed on top of charts (Pakistan play store) for quite some while. Also Gullu Butt made an update with having the famous “Aam Khaiyga” quote form Aamir Liaqat in which a character resembling Aamir Liaqt throws mangoes and the Gullu Butt character tries to catch them. Gullu butt currently has more than 100,000 Installs

    And now during this extremely politically tense situation which had the whole nation on its toes on 14th August we have another app continuing the …

    Read more →
  • Announcements Featured Startup General Meritaleem.com aims to help student make better decision regarding their future.

    Meritaleem.com aims to help student make better decision regarding their future.

    MeriTaleem.com aims to solve an age old problem for our students, where to go next?

    If you have just completed your primary school which college to pick, if you have completed your college which university to pick. There has always been lack of information or rather consolidated information regarding these questions. The best source till now has always been relatives and friends (mostly of your parents). So some uncle did CA and made a good living you should talk to him and decide, or daughter of my sister completed her medical and is practicing follow that career.

    The fact that online presence of our existing universities are limited and not …

    Read more →
  • General Mobile Apps Eccentria Technologies launches an app which shoots to the top of the charts

    Eccentria Technologies launches an app which shoots to the top of the charts

    Whoa!! this was quick so Eccentia technologies launched an app a few days ago called “Ajj Kia Pakaen” or what to cook today and today it has reached the top of charts for Pakistani Stores on iTunes and google play store.

    “Ajj Kia Pakaen” is the most common question asked at every house hold in the morning. The ladies of the family have a hard time deciding what to cook for the day. The app has a fun interface and is simple to use, you fire it up, and it gives you an option of what to cook for the day, if you like the option you can check the …

    Read more →
  • Coffee Session General Marketing/Adv Rise of facebook marketing in Pakistan

    Rise of facebook marketing in Pakistan


    Until a few years back we used to have closed groups and forums, which gathered the like minded people and anyone targeting the online audience would tap into that forum and market his/her services. So PakGamers , PakPassion initially even PakWheels used to be driven by members talking about what they loved, people used to create marketing and sales opportunities from within those discussions (so you could get a good router cheap or a gaming PC etc).
    The advent of facebook changed all that, most of the forum goers moved to the new social media. It also made a very attractive market place for some one who does not …

    Read more →
  • General Getting back

    Getting back

    I  have been out of blogging for a long long long time, a lot of things happening on personal front (including a little startup I have ben doing my self). However during my absence I met a lot of people who had followed GreenWhite at its peak, read the articles regularly.

    I had hope there would be some one else who would come ahead and cover everything going on and around us in the local tech world. There are some guys doing a great job, but for some reason I still could not find one source where I can go and read about everything, so my routine usually is to …

    Read more →
  • General Mobile Apps Software & I.T. GeniTeam launches official app for Pakistan Idol

    GeniTeam launches official app for Pakistan Idol

    GeniITeam has successfully launched an official app for PakistanIdol. This is one of the first collaboration between a reality game show and a local app development company. I am sure a lot more would follow. Previously we have seen seenreport becoming the basis of mostly all channels citizen reporting system (Like Geo Dost). This is a healthy sign and with the advent of 3G round the corner it should become a business generator for our local firms.

    App allows you to follow the contestants that you like, promote them, comment on live feedback on an episode. It offers official content from the show since it is developed with partnership with …

    Read more →
  • General 10Pearls and National Geographic Release A Geography Challenge App

    10Pearls and National Geographic Release A Geography Challenge App

    10Pearls, one of the leading Pakistani IT companies, has recently added another feather to its cap. This time, in partnership with National Geographic, 10Pearls has released the new and improved GeoBee Challenge App – an interactive app to challenge and grow the geographic knowledge of the users.

    Each year thousands of schools in the United States participate in the National Geographic Bee using materials prepared by the National Geographic Society. The competition is designed to encourage geography in the classroom, ignite student interest in the world around them, and increase public awareness about geography. Schools with students in grades four through eight are eligible for this entertaining and challenging test …

    Read more →
  • General 10Pearls Spins Off Game Plan8

    10Pearls Spins Off Game Plan8

    It’s heartening to see that Pakistani IT companies have now started to diversify themselves into non traditional areas, and are competing with global players in areas such as gaming. We have received information that 10Pearls, one of the leading  mobile and enterprise web development services companies in Pakistan, has spun-off a separate entity focused solely on developing and publishing casual mobile games.  The new entity, Game Plan8, will focus on creating 2D and 3D games for the iOS, Google Android, Kindle, Facebook and other platforms. Details can be seen on the company’s official press release at http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/12/prweb11428177.htm


    Read more →
  • General Telecom CCP Gives Guidelines Against Telecom Companies’ Deceptive Marketing

    CCP Gives Guidelines Against Telecom Companies’ Deceptive Marketing

    If only were there two things when it comes to the law, firstly the fear of breaking it and by passing the legal authority, and secondly, implementation of the law given full dedication, there would have been less competency and dishonesty in business and society. However, keeping good faith, the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has put forward “Deceptive Marketing Guidelines” which will maintain the Section 10 of the Competition Act, 2010. In order to enforce this part of the law and stop anti-competitive conduct on part of the telecom companies in advertising, the guidelines have been shared with Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) and other concerned telecommunication sector members, in …

    Read more →