Get updates in your Inbox

Open Source but Closed Supply? Will that work?

About the author

Guest

This post was written by a guest author, whose name either appears below, or who wished for his or her identity to remain private for personal reasons. However, as per Green & White policy, we have ensured that this post is unbiased, and that any disclaimers or vested interests have been disclosed below.

Guest Post by Salman Munir

Yep, we all love them and use them all the time. My de facto browser is Firefox, all my databases are in MySql and I prefer to use anything, which is Open Source. So do most of us.

Without mentioning the name of the product and the company, I have recently experienced a rather unique situation. I have been using an application like SugarCRM (www.sugarcrm.com), which came with 2 flavors i.e., Open Source and a paid professional version. No problems there! If I liked what the Open Source model has to offer and badly needed the facilities the pricier Professional version has to deliver, I would invest in it.
But what this company has done with a recent release is pretty interesting. There were features working in the Open Source version, perfectly. With the new release, on 1 feature they have imposed “use it free for 10 times in a day otherwise upgrade”, and this is a relatively simple AJAX based form. And for the other previously working feature they simply came out bluntly, Pay Now or Good Bye!
My question would be:

  1. What is at the end of the day Open Source?
  2. If some features, which were present previously working without any “Pay upfront” requirement, can they stop it in a new release?

Just imagine, tomorrow Wordpress stops to function due to some imposition like this. What is supposed to be considered as commandments of OSS applications than?

Share :
  • Print
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • Twitter
No Tags

3 additional thoughts for this post.

  1. Wasim Said:

    Cheating……….

  2. Nash Said:

    SugarCRM had a love-hate relationship with FOSS and had a strange duel licensing, but this ultimately changed to GNUv2.

    The thing you need to know is that Free software is Free as in Speech, not necessarily free as in Beer. They *can* charge you but are required to give you the source for it. But what SugarCRM did was just a lousy way of marketing their upgrade.

  3. Saud Said:

    Well if the source is available, change it. Use it for your own good. Develop your own new features and beat the guy’s business. :) It’ll require some time but for sure it can be done.

Leave a Comment

Subscribe without commenting

Sponsors:


Hey Tweeters! Sign your profile below!


  • Recent Comments: