Comments on: More on Wiki Adoption http://greenwhite.org/2007/02/19/more-on-wiki-adoption/ Coffee Sessions for the Industry! Sat, 13 Mar 2010 09:13:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Osama A. http://greenwhite.org/2007/02/19/more-on-wiki-adoption/comment-page-1/#comment-636 Osama A. Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:34:17 +0000 http://greenwhite.org/2007/02/19/more-on-wiki-adoption/#comment-636 Thanks for the kind comments. Yes, many software vendors simply forget that technology is a means to enabling improvement in life. E.g. if all someone needs is a way to support active collaboration and discussions between teams by providing an even, democratic playing field, then even a blog where the entire team can publish works great Thanks for the kind comments.

Yes, many software vendors simply forget that technology is a means to enabling improvement in life.

E.g. if all someone needs is a way to support active collaboration and discussions between teams by providing an even, democratic playing field, then even a blog where the entire team can publish works great

]]> By: Guillaume http://greenwhite.org/2007/02/19/more-on-wiki-adoption/comment-page-1/#comment-635 Guillaume Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:47:25 +0000 http://greenwhite.org/2007/02/19/more-on-wiki-adoption/#comment-635 I like this post. It neither too short nor too long. It makes its point clearly (kindof the opposite of wikipatterns, as far as it seems ;-). And most importantly, it emphasizes strongly the fact that a wiki is not so much of a piece of software than an elegant solution to coordination, participation and sharing issues. I need a place I can access to publish and exchange information easily, not an "amazing bottom-up integration coordinated with attachments in a powerful search engine that sends RSS feeds to your mailbox without you having the hassle not to go further for a wiki page"... I like this post. It neither too short nor too long. It makes its point clearly (kindof the opposite of wikipatterns, as far as it seems ;-) . And most importantly, it emphasizes strongly the fact that a wiki is not so much of a piece of software than an elegant solution to coordination, participation and sharing issues.

I need a place I can access to publish and exchange information easily, not an “amazing bottom-up integration coordinated with attachments in a powerful search engine that sends RSS feeds to your mailbox without you having the hassle not to go further for a wiki page”…

]]>